Camp Barnabas…servants among us


 

It was Saturday morning and I was warm and cozy in bed. I wasn’t ready to face the cold morning yet. I started watching an Extreme Makeover show from 2005. It caught my attention.

The couple receiving the make over were the Teas who run Camp Barnabas nestled in the Ozarks in southwestern Missouri. The camp volunteers submitted their names as worthy of a make-over because their house was in dire need of repair.  That of course is the theme of every extreme make-over but this one was different.

The Teas couple have been running Camp Barnabas for seventeen years. He studied to be an underwater archeologist and she was a pediatric nurse. They felt called to service. When they started the camp, their own children were still in elementary school. Now they are mature adults. When they came home from college, they often slept on the couches in the living room because visiting volunteers were given their rooms to sleep.  

The reason that the Teas’ home was in disrepair was due to their not taking  any more money out of the camp than that which was absolutely needed. They weighed every repair over the cost of a scholarship for another child. Thus, there was much personal neglect of their own needs. Their son summed up their attitude. As long as they had a roof over their heads, they were satisfied.

At that point I got a call. The TV which was to be delivered between 8 and 12 was ten minutes away. It was only 7:15. I had to stop watching. Due to a couple of minor problems, I did not get back to the program until the very end. It seems instead of one house for the owners of the camp, they were gifted with three buildings. Their home, a bunk house for visiting volunteers, and a rainy day activity building for the campers complete with all types of diversions and games.

I became interested in this camp and wanted to know more about it. Camp Barnabas was named after Joseph, surnamed Barnabas, who was made a saint. He was a doctor as well as an apostle associated with Paul and was known for his kind heart. From the little I heard about the Teas family, that describes them as well.

The Teas’ camp is for children with special needs. They try to accomodate to the best of their ability as many children as they can. This is their next summer’s schedule.

Summer 2010 Camp Schedule

 Siblings are invited to all terms EXCEPT Terms 1, 5 and 9.

 Term 1:  Adult Friends Tuesday, June 1st – Monday, June 7th Developmentally Disabled (Ages 18-45) Returning campers older than 45 may enroll.

Term 2:  Challenge Week  Wednesday, June 9th – Tuesday, June 15th Physically Disabled (Ages 7-15)
Term 3:  Young Friends Thursday, June 17th – Wednesday, June 23rd Autism/Developmentally Disabled (Ages 7-15)
Term 4:  Champions Friday, June 25th – Thursday, July 1st Physically & Developmentally Disabled (Ages 7-15)
Term 5:  Heroes Week Wednesday, July 7th – Tuesday, July 13th Autism/Developmentally Disabled (Ages 16-25)

 Term 6:  Eagles in Flight Thursday, July 15th – Wednesday, July 21st
Hematology/Oncology, Burn Patients, Chronic Illnesses, Diabetes, Sickle Cell, Hemophilia, Amputees, Craniofacial Syndromes & High Functioning Asperger’s Syndrome (Ages 7-17)
Term 7:  Bridge Builders Friday, July 23rd – Thursday, July 29th Autism/Developmentally Disabled (Ages 7-15)

 Term 8: Sensational Week Sunday, August 1st – Saturday, August 7th Blind/Visually Impaired, Deaf/Hard of Hearing (Ages 7-25)

Term 9:   Adventures Week Monday, August 9th – Sunday, August 15th Physically Disabled (Ages 16-35)

This is from their website. We strive to meet the needs of every person that applies to be a camper. Your eligibility starts with being age appropriate:  our youngest campers are age 7.  Other requirements include having a challenge or disease that fits into our program safely and appropriately.

As you can see, their camping services extend beyond the age of 17. Some campers continue to  return after they are 45 and are still welcomed.

You also notice that there is no lapse in there summer schedule. There is no down time. There is only one day between one group leaving and another group arriving. They don’t take the week end off. I found this to be very impressive. The schedule is as packed as possible to serve the needs of as many children as possible.

In contrast to this story, a week before when I was driving to church, I was listening to a PBS interview featuring an IRS agent. The topic was the proliferation of “charities” within the past decade. The people with “charitable hearts” asking for donations to “serve others” are coming out of the woodwork in droves….kind of like cockroaches. (My words…not the IRS agent’s) He mentioned two organizations who have been operating, although he didn’t specifically tell the names. One is a breast cancer group who manages to have $0.13 left after administrative costs. The other was a veterans’ group that out of every dollar collected, have $0.01 left for the veterans. The IRS is starting to watch groups like these more closely. They want to have their records more open for potential donors to see where their money is going.

When I started researching for today’s blog, I ran across some very interesting information. I’m sure you have seen the commercials on TV millions of time about the children in third world countries. Maria has never worn any shoes as she walks though the garbage heaps looking for metals to recycle. Jose greets everybody he can while looking for scraps of  food. Twelve year old Mohammad often doesn’t eat because he shares his food with his three little siblings. He is the only one caring for them.

 These commercials are deliberately designed to tug at heart-strings. What the public doesn’t know is that the CEO’s of these charities are tugging at the purse strings at the same time.  These are the 2008 salaries of the top four execs of Children’s International. That is just one sample.

:

If you wish more information about a charity you may support, you can begin here where you can find the IRS 990 forms of many organizations.

Then there is the salary of this CEO.

Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Steven Altschuler, CEO
$2,371,282

He is third on the list of the top ten executive compensation packages for non-profit organizations. The median pay for top non-profit executives rose 7% in 2008 to $418,555, a fraction of the $7.6 million in median pay for S&P 500 CEOs in 2008, a USA TODAY analysis found.  Did your income rise 7% in 2008?

The justification I keep hearing over and over is “We pay that much to keep the talent. They’d just go elsewhere if we didn’t.” I’m sorry. The income for these establishments are coming from people who expect to help as many CHILDREN as possible. If the CEOs of charities are so talented, LET them go to for-profit organizations.

The salary of Cook, receiving close to $ 0.5 million pales in comparison to Altshuler’s $2.3 million annual salary. There are too many examples of what I consider ultimate greed to cite. How did it get so out of control? How many other people are like the Teas in comparison to those who are like Altshuler?

The Better Business Bureau allows non-profits to have membership if their administrative costs are held to 35 – 50% of monies donated. That in itself is rather generous when you are talking sometimes billions of dollars.

I am definitely not advocating no longer giving. We MUST continue to do that. What I am advocating is that all of us with open purses need to have a say with the money that we give. We need to be aware of how and where that money is spent. We need to sweep out the roaches in the non-profits and get more of the money where it was intended to go. Namaste. Attic Annie

Advertisements

2 Comments

Filed under Casual conversation, diary, general topics, life, relationships, Uncategorized

2 responses to “Camp Barnabas…servants among us

  1. That’s a good article. I don’t think that too many people think about the charity when they’re asked to give, or when they give. It’s a lot like the guy in the street who needs a dollar for bus fare back home.

    There are people who do need help, and there are organizations who can give it – then there are the organizations who take the money and run.

    TV commercials are expensive – even those that run at 3 am next to the “make lots of money staying at home and taking a nap” ads.

    “The other was a veterans’ group that out of every dollar collected, have $0.01 left for the veterans.”
    I think I know that one – or at least, one like it. The first letter I got from them had a nickel attached. It seemed like a good cause, and I sent in $10.05. Since then (about two years), they’ve been sending me solicitations with personalized address labels. I’ll never have to write a return address on an envelope again.

    But somewhat later I found out that their administrative costs were pretty high, so I don’t send them any more. But I keep getting address labels.

    The “Non-profit CEO salary” article you link to is about non-profits (yes, Universities are somehow “non-profit”), not charities like the Red Cross and Camp Barnabas.

    I think it makes sense to look closer to home when people are ready to give to a charity. Red Cross and United Way are (for me, at least) nameless entities whose functions I don’t understand – and both of those have let politics rather than need determine who they give to.

    That’s the thing I was trying to come up with: they’re middlemen, and by the very nature of Man and business, they’ve got to take a cut of what’s coming in. [Sorta like the US giving financial aid to a 3rd world country: the leaders and dictators take their 90% off the top, and whatever’s left over just might make it down to the Marias, Joses and Mohammeds.]

    The new administration has been restructuring the tax code to make it less attractive to donate to charity. They seem to feel that only Government is in a position to decide who gets help, and that people shouldn’t try to do such a difficult job themselves.